On December 1, I wrote an article titled Abkhazia Integrates Military With Russia for Sofrep.com. Since the publishing of the piece, the Kremlin has continued its pursuit of integrating both Abkhazia and its fellow Georgian breakaway territory South Ossetia into its strategic effort to ensure and increase its influence over the governments of its near abroad. As the United States, the European Union (EU), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) continue to work through ways in which to confront and roll back an aggressive Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe, it is becoming obvious that the Caucasus will soon be both tied to the war in Ukraine and possibly another violent front in the larger conflict itself.
The article outlined the recent Russia-Abkhazia joint forces agreement, signed in Sochi Russia on November 24. The treaty, which binds the military of Georgia’s breakaway territory Abkhazia to Russia, was later ratified by both the Russian and Abkhazian legislatures and legally codified the terms agreed to in Sochi.
Abkhazia’s statehood, recognized by only five states, is a matter of significant and delicate geopolitical importance to both the West (the United States, the European Union/NATO, and allied countries) and Russia. Abkhazia (and its fellow Georgian breakaway territory South Ossetia) is a strategic pressure point in the battle between Russia and the West. You can find the original article at Sofrep.com here.
Thank you for reading.
Earlier this week, Russia and the Georgian breakaway region of Abkhazia finalized an agreement strengthening ties between Moscow and Sukhumi. The agreement, signed in Sochi on November 24, deepens cooperation between Abkhazia and Russia, effectively integrating Abkhazia’s foreign policy with Russia’s and creating a joint military structure that places Abkhazia’s military forces under the command of Russian officers.
Under the terms of Monday’s accord, Putin said Russia would grant 5 billion rubles ($111.4 million) to Abkhazia, whose population of 240,000 comprises a mix of ethnic groups.
The agreement, posted on the Kremlin website, envisages a “joint defense and security space” and stipulates Russian “protection of the state border of the Republic of Abkhazia with Georgia.”
It obliges Russia to facilitate “in every possible way” growing Abkhazia’s international ties and promoting its global recognition.
Moscow would also ease requirements for Abkhazia residents to obtain Russian citizenship, but it has not voiced plans to annex the territory. (Reuters, November 24)
Denunciations of the agreement, typical in the wake of recent aggressive Russian interventionist action in Eastern Europe, began rolling in almost immediately. Statements reflecting and underlining the increasingly hostile nature of Russian foreign policy in regards to the country’s so-called “near abroad” were stark, conveying the apprehension of state governments in the post-Soviet space of Eastern Europe.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) immediately declared its opposition to the agreement and warned of the possibility of growing impediments to peace in the Caucasus. The European Union also issued a statement condemning the agreement, citing a violation of Georgia’s territorial integrity and warning of a growing instability in the region:
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said in a statement that the “so-called treaty,” signed Monday, did not contribute to a peaceful and lasting settlement of the situation in Georgia and the Western alliance would not recognize it.
EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said in a statement that the agreement violated Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and was “detrimental to ongoing efforts to stabilize the security situation in the region.” (The Moscow Times, November 25)
For its part, Georgian government officials echoed statements from NATO and the EU. Most interestingly, Foreign Minister Tamar Beruchashvili spoke specifically of the threat of encroaching Russian influence in the South Caucasus and the increasing likelihood that annexation, not unlike that which the Kremlin used to absorb Crimea last spring, is evident in Georgia:
“The signing of this document will have a negative impact on the security situation in Georgia’s occupied territories as well as in the broader context of European security,” she said, adding that the deal infringed Georgia’s territorial integrity. (The Moscow Times, November 25)
NATO member-state officials, particularly those in the former Soviet republic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, were notably disturbed by the agreement, again reinforcing declared fears of an encroaching Russian threat upon the post-Soviet space. Estonian Foreign Minister Keit Pentus-Rosimannus noted the violation of Georiga’s territorial integrity and highlighted the illegality of the agreement specifically on the grounds that it violated Georgian sovereignty:
“There is a threat that such activities will lead to the annexation of part of the territory of Georgia by Russia,” the Minister said.
“This step is a violation of Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and is contrary to international law, the commitment that Russia has made before the Council of Europe and to the so-called six-point peace plan [signed on August 12, 2008, just after Russia-Georgia war]”.
Pentus-Rosimannus estimated the agreement signed yesterday also damaged the Geneva negotiations process and thereby the security and stability of the entire region.
“Russia’s current activities in Abkhazia, including the erecting of border installations is illegal,” she said.
“We call on Russia to fulfil all of its 2008 ceasefire commitments including the removal of its troops to pre-conflict positions. Also, we consider it important that the representatives of the European Union observer mission have access to areas of Abkhazia.” (Agenda.ge, November 25)
Latvia’s president also cried foul, specifically addressing the impact of the agreement on stability:
Latvian President Andris Berzins said on Wednesday an agreement deepening cooperation between Russia and Georgia’s Abkhazia region threatened regional stability and security.
But, during a visit to the Georgian capital Tbilisi, he also said it was vital for Russia’s neighbors to look for ways to live beside it in peace…
“I consider this agreement … will negatively affect safety and stability in the region,” Berzins told a news conference with Georgian President Georgy Margvelashvili. (Margarita Antidze, Reuters, November 26)
Lithuania’s official statement denounced the agreement as well:
“We concur the 24/11/2014 statement of the High Representative of the European Union for foreign affairs and security policy Federica Mogherini stating that the so-called treaty ‘violates Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, contradicts principles of international law and the international commitments of the Russian Federation, including the 12 August 2008 Agreement and its Implementing Measures of 8 September 2008′,” the Ministry said.
Lithuania stresses the importance of the Geneva International Discussions in ensuring the security and stability in the region and reaching for peaceful resolution of the conflict. (The Lithuania Tribune, November 25)
The concerns communicated by officials in the Baltic states largely mirror the outrage expressed by Ukrainian lawmakers and government officials following the annexation of Crimea by Russia last March. Georgian government officials are now in almost full crisis mode, citing fears of an effort by Moscow to mimic the agreement with Abkhazia in Georgia’s other breakaway region, South Ossetia.
What and Where Next?
As Moscow continues to pursue policies of aggressive intervention in its near abroad, encroaching upon the territorial integrity of former Soviet republics such as Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia, other states (particularly the Baltics) will increasingly feel threatened. As members of the Atlantic Alliance, the Baltic nations have their security underwritten by the other states in NATO.
As Russian interventionism, characterized by imperialistic policies and interference in the affairs of the other post-Soviet states, continues to cascade throughout the former Soviet republics, governments from Eastern Europe to Central Asia have expressed frustration and indignation with the seemingly unimpeded aggressive policies of the Kremlin in Ukraine and Georgia. Increasingly, observers in Moldova and the Baltics have girded themselves for much of the same out of Moscow.
(You can find the original article at Sofrep.com here.)
(Featured photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Latest posts by Eric Jones (see all)
- Overwatch: the Foreign Intrigue Podcast, Episode 2 (United States Presidential Candidates and Foreign Policy) - 15 February 2016
- Overwatch: the Foreign Intrigue Podcast, Episode 1 (Foreign Policy and the US Presidential Election) - 8 February 2016
- Central Asia at a Crossroads: Introduction and Overview - 30 December 2015